New JerseyChatham

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center

415 Southern Blvd, Chatham, NJ 07928 · Morris County · 108 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Sep 25, 1970

Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 24, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260E
202470E
2025100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.283.883.95bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.740.670.69top 28% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.113.533.50bottom 34% in New Jersey; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.540.500.48top 29% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.739.745.8bottom 46% in New Jersey; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.137.742.9top 22% in New Jersey; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.78, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chatham Ventures LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2015
Einhorn, NealIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest48%12/31/2014
Friedman, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest48%12/31/2014
Boshulte, JanelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2022
Boshulte, JanelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2022
Chatham Hills Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2014
Einhorn, NealIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2014
Friedman, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2014
Prager, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2015
Prager, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2015
Preimesberger, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2024
Preimesberger, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare1.8 miMadison, NJ★★★★★4/5
Spring Grove Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center2.7 miNew Providence, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Cheshire Home2.8 miFlorham Park, NJ★★★★★4/5
Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.0 miFlorham Park, NJ★★★★★5/5
Continuing Care at Lantern Hill3.9 miNew Providence, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Berkeley Heights4.0 miBerkeley Heights, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Morristown Post Acute Rehab and Nursing Center4.4 miMorristown, NJ★★★★★4/5
Careone at Madison Avenue4.4 miMorristown, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Careone at Livingston4.4 miLivingston, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Runnells Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare4.9 miBerkeley Heights, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Livia Health and Senior Living5.4 miEast Hanover, NJ★★★★★4/5
Careone at Hanover Township5.5 miWhippany, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chatham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315120.