How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
520 W 9th St, Jasper, IN 47546 (opens Google Maps) · Dubois County · (812) 482-6603· 65 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Mar 5, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · from a complaint · F-0691 |
| Jan 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.71 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 10% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 39% in Indiana; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.43 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Indiana; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 49% in Indiana; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.4 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 43% in Indiana; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 40.4 | 42.9 | bottom 35% in Indiana; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.99, RN 0.69, weekend 2.68.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.99 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cathedral Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 520 Jasper Propco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Greatorex, Tina | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| JSJ Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Samara Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Schiowitz, Marc | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Sebbag, Gabriel | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Adams County Memorial Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Advanced Care Consultants LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Betz, Alli | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2021 |
| Betz, Alli | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2021 |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Burla, Kiran | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2021 |
| Burla, Kiran | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2021 |
| Cathedral Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Cathedral Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| First Bank of Berne | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ide Management Group — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serenity Spring Senior Living at Northwood | 1.2 mi | Jasper, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Timbers of Jasper the | 1.5 mi | Jasper, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St Charles Health Campus | 1.6 mi | Jasper, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brookside Village INC | 1.8 mi | Jasper, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Waters of Huntingburg, the | 5.8 mi | Huntingburg, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Scenic Hills at the Monastery | 12.2 mi | Ferdinand, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Willowdale Village | 15.3 mi | Dale, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Core of Dale | 15.8 mi | Dale, IN | —/5 | SFF | |
| Poplar Care Strategies | 19.1 mi | Loogootee, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Amber Manor Care Center | 19.4 mi | Petersburg, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155720.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details