How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Cloverleaf of Knightsville
9325 N Crawford St, Knightsville, IN 47857 (opens Google Maps) · Clay County · (812) 446-2309· 102 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 13, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.69
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. F-0698
The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. F-0744
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Feb 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.69
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.67
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.41
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.69 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 10% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 33% in Indiana; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.41 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 11% in Indiana; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 15% in Indiana; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.7 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 26% in Indiana; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 9% in Indiana; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.09, RN 0.77, weekend 2.77.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.09 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cloverleaf of Knightsville. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9245 Knightsville Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Abbott, Alexa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Abbott, Alexa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Adams County Memorial Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Advanced Care Consultants LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Cloverleaf Nursig and Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Cloverleaf Nursig and Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| First Bank of Berne | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Greatorex, Tina | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2025 |
| Johnson, Craig | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Johnson, Craig | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Lehman, Scott | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2020 |
| Lehman, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2020 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ide Management Group — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Colonial Nursing Home — Crown Point, IN · overall 2/5
- Kendallville Manor — Kendallville, IN · overall 5/5
- Oak Village — Oaktown, IN · overall 2/5
- River Terrace Health Care Center — Bluffton, IN · overall 5/5
- Silver Memories Health Care — Versailles, IN · overall 4/5
- Warsaw Meadows — Warsaw, IN · overall 1/5abuse
- Yorktown Manor — Yorktown, IN · overall 4/5
- Cathedral Health Care Center — Jasper, IN · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "What specific dementia training do your staff receive, and how do you handle difficult moments without medication?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Indiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 32 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 17 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hutsonwood at Brazil | 1.1 mi | Brazil, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hickory Creek at Sunset | 14.0 mi | Greencastle, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Asbury Towers Health Care Center | 14.3 mi | Greencastle, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Waters of Greencastle, the | 14.4 mi | Greencastle, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of Terre Haute | 15.1 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mill Pond Health Campus | 15.3 mi | Greencastle, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Deming Park | 15.6 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Aperion Care Summerfield | 15.8 mi | Cloverdale, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Southwood Healthcare Center | 17.0 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Majestic Care of Terre Haute | 17.0 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harrison's Crossing Health Campus | 17.5 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westminster Village Health & Rehab | 18.0 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155542.