Indiana ›Jasper

St Charles Health Campus

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

3150 St Charles St, Jasper, IN 47546 (opens Google Maps) · Dubois County · (812) 634-6570· 68 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Jul 31, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 19, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 25, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554

View all 10 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jun 19, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Jun 19, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Jun 19, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Mar 7, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Mar 7, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Mar 7, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Mar 7, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
202440D
202511G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.32
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.06
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.86
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.323.423.95top 47% in Indiana; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.060.620.69top 5% in Indiana; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.863.013.50top 50% in Indiana; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.940.470.48top 3% in Indiana; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.345.945.8top 33% in Indiana; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.740.442.9top 26% in Indiana; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.77, RN 1.21, weekend 3.25.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.77 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Charles Health Campus. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Good Samaritan HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/01/2015
American Healthcare Reit Holdings LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
American Healthcare Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Barney, LeighIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2019
Barney, LeighIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2026
Brink, ThomasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Brink, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Brocksmith, SusanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2016
Brocksmith, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2016
Burla, KiranIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Burla, KiranIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2025
Davis, DavidIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2026
Dewesse, StanleyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/08/2020
Dewesse, StanleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/08/2020
Ellerman, TimIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Ellerman, TimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Gahc3 Trilogy JV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Gahc4 Trilogy JV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Good Samaritan HospitalOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Howard, JonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014

Showing 20 of 46 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 26 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Trilogy Health Services — 123 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 122 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
  • "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
  • "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 46 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 13 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Timbers of Jasper the0.3 miJasper, IN★★★★☆4/5
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Northwood0.6 miJasper, IN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Cathedral Health Care Center1.6 miJasper, IN★★★★☆4/5
Brookside Village INC3.3 miJasper, IN★★★★★4/5
Waters of Huntingburg, the7.3 miHuntingburg, IN★★☆☆☆1/5
Scenic Hills at the Monastery13.9 miFerdinand, IN★★★☆☆4/5
Willowdale Village16.8 miDale, IN★★★★★5/5
Core of Dale17.2 miDale, IN—/5SFF
Poplar Care Strategies17.6 miLoogootee, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Amber Manor Care Center18.3 miPetersburg, IN★★★★★4/5
Villages at Oak Ridge, the19.0 miWashington, IN★★★☆☆3/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care Center19.4 miPetersburg, IN★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jasper →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155674.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details