North Carolina ›Raleigh

Capital Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

3000 Holston Lane, Raleigh, NC 27610 (opens Google Maps) · Wake County · (919) 231-6045· 125 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1980 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 7, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.52
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. F-0757

View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Aug 7, 2025B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Sep 16, 2024B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Mar 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Mar 9, 2023B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Mar 9, 2023B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202460D
202550D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNorth Carolina averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.52
North Carolina average: 4.01
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.39
North Carolina average: 0.64
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.16
North Carolina average: 3.56
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.524.013.95bottom 39% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.640.69bottom 24% in North Carolina; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.163.563.50bottom 43% in North Carolina; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.290.410.48bottom 42% in North Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.549.045.8top 20% in North Carolina; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.345.742.9top 28% in North Carolina; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.40, RN 0.38, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.40 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Capital Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
John a McNeill Jr 2012 Irrv TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Wake County, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—10/01/2005
Liberty Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
McNeill, JohnIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—10/01/2005
McNeill, RonaldIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—10/01/2005
Ayers, TracyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Ayers, TracyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2025
Calcutt, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Calcutt, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Liberty Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Liberty Healthcare Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Liberty Healthcare Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Long Term Care Management Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2005
McNeill, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
McNeill, RobertIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
McNeill, RonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2005
Miller, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Miller, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Moore, AmandaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Liberty Senior Living — 37 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 36 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
  • "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the North Carolina midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 23 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sunnybrook Rehabilitation Center0.2 miRaleigh, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Tower Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.2 miRaleigh, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Raleigh Rehabilitation Center3.9 miRaleigh, NC★★★☆☆3/5
The Cardinal at North Hills4.5 miRaleigh, NC★★★☆☆4/5
Bloomsbury at Hayes Barton Place4.6 miRaleigh, NC—/5
Wellington Rehabilitation and Healthcare5.5 miKnightdale, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pruitthealth-Raleigh5.8 miRaleigh, NC★★★☆☆3/5
The Laurels of Forest Glenn5.9 miGarner, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Raleigh at Crabtree Valley6.5 miRaleigh, NC★★★★☆4/5
Rex Rehab & Nursing Care Center7.0 miRaleigh, NC★★★★★4/5
Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation Center7.3 miRaleigh, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Perry Creek Health and Rehabilitation Center7.3 miRaleigh, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Wake, NC — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Raleigh →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345202.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details