How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
4412 South Main Street, Salisbury, NC 28147 (opens Google Maps) · Rowan County · (704) 637-3040· 90 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since May 31, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · F-0810 |
| Sep 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.66 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 49% in North Carolina; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 26% in North Carolina; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.33 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.41 | 0.48 | bottom 5% in North Carolina; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.9 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 7% in North Carolina; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 23% in North Carolina; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.35, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.17 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan County. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Bernardini, Holly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Bernardini, Holly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/23/2026 |
| Calcutt, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Calcutt, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Henderson, Gary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Henderson, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/23/2026 |
| Liberty Healthcare Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Liberty Healthcare Properties of Rowan County, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Liberty Real Properties, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Long Term Care Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| McNeill, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2005 |
| McNeill, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| McNeill, Robert | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2026 |
| McNeill, Ronald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2005 |
| McNeill, Ronald | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Miller, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Miller, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Oliver, Anna | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2026 |
| Purvis, Jenny | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/23/2026 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Liberty Senior Living — 37 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 36 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Oaks | 2.9 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Piedmont Health & Rehab Center | 4.3 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Laurels of Salisbury | 4.8 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Health & Rehabilitation | 4.9 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| NC State Veterans Home - Salisbury | 5.2 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Salisbury | 5.3 mi | Salisbury, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Compass Healthcare and Rehab Rowan, LLC | 6.1 mi | Spencer, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Big Elm Retirement and Nursing Centers | 9.7 mi | Kannapolis, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Kannapolis Health and Rehabilitation | 11.8 mi | Kannapolis, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Greens at Cabarrus | 12.6 mi | Concord, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Copperfield Health & Rehabilitation | 13.1 mi | Concord, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Five Oaks Rehabilitation and Care Center | 13.3 mi | Concord, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345503.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details