North CarolinaBenson

Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of

2315 Highway 242 North, Benson, NC 27504 · Johnston County · 100 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Sep 25, 2002

Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$15,593
Fines, last 3 years
3.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 8, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 8, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 21, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2022 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 20, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, approved x-ray services or have an agreement with an approved provider to supply them. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023213J ▲
202490E
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $15,593.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 8, 2023Fine$7,796
Dec 8, 2023Fine$7,797

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.154.013.95bottom 11% in North Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.640.69bottom 24% in North Carolina; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.863.563.50bottom 17% in North Carolina; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.410.48bottom 29% in North Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.549.045.8bottom 47% in North Carolina; bottom 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.545.742.9top 50% in North Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.43, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
John a McNeill Jr 2012 Irrv TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehab of Johnston County, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10/01/2002
Liberty Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, JohnIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, RonaldIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Ronald B. and Cynthia J. McNeill 2013 Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Calcutt, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Calcutt, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Hogue, JanetIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Hogue, JanetIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2025
James, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
James, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2025
Liberty Healthcare Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Liberty Healthcare Properties of Columbus County LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Liberty Real Properties, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Long Term Care Management Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, RobertIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Miller, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Carrolton of Dunn8.4 miDunn, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harnett Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.7 miDunn, NC★★★★★4/5
Lillington Health and Rehabilitation Center12.9 miLillington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Barbour Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center14.0 miSmithfield, NC★★★★☆4/5
Smithfield Manor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cen14.4 miSmithfield, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Emerald Health & Rehab Center15.3 miLillington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Liberty Healthcare Services of Golden Years Nursin15.6 miFalcon, NC★★★★☆5/5
Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center16.6 miClayton, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Springbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.0 miClayton, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Fuquay-Varina Health and Rehabilitation Center18.6 miFuquay Varina, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Benson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345519.