Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 16, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Sep 16, 2025
$8,788
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 6 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 6 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Sep 16, 2025
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Sep 16, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Sep 16, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 16, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919
Sep 26, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607
Sep 26, 2024
B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations:
2
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2025
All citations:
4
Serious citations (G–L):
1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2024
2
0
D
2025
4
1
G ▲
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Sep 16, 2025
Fine
$8,788
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNorth Carolina averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.24
North Carolina average:
4.01
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.59
North Carolina average:
0.64
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
2.93
North Carolina average:
3.56
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
North Carolina avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.24
4.01
3.95
bottom 18% in North Carolina; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.59
0.64
0.69
top 40% in North Carolina; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
2.93
3.56
3.50
bottom 22% in North Carolina; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.29
0.41
0.48
bottom 42% in North Carolina; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
48.8
49.0
45.8
bottom 50% in North Carolina; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
20.0
45.7
42.9
top 12% in North Carolina; top 13% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.34, RN 0.61, weekend 3.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.34 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Elizabethtown Healthcare & Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Ronald B. and Cynthia J. McNeill 2013 Irrevocable Trust
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Barrow, Lori
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Barrow, Lori
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
04/02/2025
Calcutt, Joseph
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Calcutt, Joseph
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Caquias Gonzalez, Eileen
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
03/03/2025
Caquias Gonzalez, Eileen
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
04/02/2025
John a McNeill Jr 2014 Irrevocable Trust
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Liberty Healthcare Management INC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Liberty Healthcare Properties of Bladen County,llc
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Liberty Real Properties II LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Long Term Care Management Services LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
McNeill, John
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
McNeill, Robert
Individual
Trustee of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
McNeill, Ronald
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/31/2025
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Liberty Senior Living — 37 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.