How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
300 Broadway Avenue, Sayville, NY 11782 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 567-9300· 180 certified beds · avg 173 residents/day · certified since Oct 22, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. F-0725
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Mar 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 15, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 15, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.58 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 4% in New York; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 16% in New York; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.37 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 7% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 41% in New York; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 22.5 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 9% in New York; top 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 46% in New York; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.23, RN 0.51, weekend 2.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.23 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sayville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernath, Shaya | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 05/31/2022 |
| Hagar, Chaim | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 05/31/2022 |
| Hager, Jacob | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 05/31/2022 |
| Hager, Shifra | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 05/31/2022 |
| Kahan, Elliot | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/31/2022 |
| Oberlander, Zalmen | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/31/2022 |
| Rozenberg, Kenneth | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 22% | 05/31/2022 |
| Scarione, Michael | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2018 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Nursing and Rehabilitation Care Ctr | 2.8 mi | Sayville, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Affinity Skilled Living and Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | Oakdale, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Swan Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.7 mi | Patchogue, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Island Nursing and Rehab Center | 4.6 mi | Holtsville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brookhaven Health Care Facility, LLC | 5.0 mi | East Patchogue, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medford Multicare Center for Living | 6.0 mi | Medford, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing | 6.1 mi | East Islip, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care | 6.9 mi | Brookhaven, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center at | 7.6 mi | Nesconset, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 8.9 mi | St James, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills Pond | 8.9 mi | St James, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brookside Multicare Nursing Center | 9.2 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335761.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details