How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
68 Hauppauge Road, Commack, NY 11725 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 715-2000· 460 certified beds · avg 433 residents/day · certified since Oct 17, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 17, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| Aug 22, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Aug 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.24 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 40% in New York; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 21% in New York; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.70 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in New York; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 28% in New York; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.8 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 16% in New York; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 24.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 18% in New York; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.89, weekend 3.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Gurwin Jewish Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gurwin Healthcare System, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/14/2021 |
| Almer, Stuart | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Almer, Stuart | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Almer, Stuart | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Angowitz, Gerald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Brodsky, Bert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Brodsky, Bert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Carpentieri, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2023 |
| Carpentieri, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2025 |
| Dunne, Anne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Finkel, Noah | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Furst-Eysler, Pamela | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2018 |
| Gordon Loozis, Lisa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Gurwin Flug, Laura | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Gurwin Flug, Laura | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Jagtiani, Anil | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Kantor, Edwin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Karlin, Bert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Konigsberg, Frederic | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Konigsberg, Frederic | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.4 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maria Regina Rehabilitation and Nursing | 4.8 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Apex Rehabilitation & Care Center | 4.9 mi | Huntington Station, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Carillon Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.0 mi | Huntington, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Huntington Hills Center for Health and Rehabilitat | 5.6 mi | Melville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Catherine of Siena Nursing and Rehabilitation C | 5.7 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookside Multicare Nursing Center | 5.8 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Johnland Nursing Center | 6.0 mi | Kings Park, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pine Forest Car Center for Rehab & Healthcare | 6.4 mi | Huntington, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunrise Manor Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio | 6.8 mi | Bay Shore, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care | 7.4 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center at | 7.5 mi | Nesconset, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335696.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details