How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Ann's Choice
16000 Ann'S Choice Way, Warminster, PA 18974 (opens Google Maps) · Bucks County · (215) 443-3900· 66 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Apr 17, 2007 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING (17 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 15, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. F-0572
The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. F-0638
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572 |
| Aug 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Aug 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.09
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.47
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.72
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.09 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.47 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 8% in Pennsylvania; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.72 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 10% in Pennsylvania; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.09 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 7% in Pennsylvania; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 9% in Pennsylvania; top 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.62, RN 1.34, weekend 4.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.62 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ann's Choice. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Senior Communities, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/14/2021 |
| Bison, Michael | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/20/2025 |
| Brown, Ian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Brown, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Butler, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Clupper, Katherine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Clupper, Katherine | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Colins, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| Colins, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Embley, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2021 |
| Embley, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2021 |
| Embley, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2021 |
| Erickson Senior Living LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2020 |
| Erickson Senior Living LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2025 |
| Erstad, Eileen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Erstad, Eileen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Hall, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2010 |
| Hall, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2010 |
| Hall, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2010 |
| Jacque, Zina | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 46 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 26 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Erickson Senior Living — 17 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Continuing Care at Maris Grove — Glen Mills, PA · overall 5/5
- Continuing Care at Eagles Trace — Houston, TX · overall 4/5
- Continuing Care at Highland Springs — Dallas, TX · overall 3/5
- Ashby Ponds INC — Ashburn, VA · overall 4/5
- Greenspring Village — Springfield, VA · overall 1/5
- Continuing Care at Wind Crest — Highlands Ranch, CO · overall 5/5
- Chatsworth at Pga National — Palm Beach Gardens, FL · overall 5/5
- Tallgrass Creek, INC — Overland Park, KS · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 16 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can I get a written copy of resident rights, house rules, and a full list of services and charges today?"
- "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 27% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 46 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 156 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christ's Home Retirement Community | 0.7 mi | Warminster, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.0 mi | Warminster, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Luther Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | Hatboro, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court-Southampton | 1.9 mi | Southampton, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Masonic Village at Warminster | 1.9 mi | Warminster, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Willow Grove Post Acute | 3.0 mi | Hatboro, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Huntingdon Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent | 3.8 mi | Huntingdon Valley, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Garden Spring Rehab and Care Center | 4.0 mi | Willow Grove, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Richboro Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 4.2 mi | Richboro, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Neshaminy Manor Home | 5.4 mi | Warrington, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Holland Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 5.6 mi | Holland, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookside Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Roslyn, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Bucks, PA — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Belle Terrace — Quakertown, PA · overall 3/5
- Bristol Health & Rehab Center — Bristol, PA · overall 1/5
- Buckingham Valley Rehabilitation and Nursingcenter — Buckingham, PA · overall 5/5
- Chandler Hall Health Services — Newtown, PA · overall 5/5
- Community at Rockhill, the — Sellersville, PA · overall 5/5
- Crestview Center — Langhorne, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Harborview Rehabilitation Care Center at Doylestow — Doylestown, PA · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 396107.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).