MassachusettsWrentham

Alliance Health at Maples

90 Taunton Street, Wrentham, MA 02093 · Norfolk County · 144 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1990

Part of chain: ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$47,886
Fines, last 3 years
4.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 17, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 8, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Sep 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Sep 8, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 17, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 21, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Mar 21, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110E
202441G ▲
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $47,886.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 17, 2024Fine$47,886

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.293.893.95top 22% in Massachusetts; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.520.650.69bottom 36% in Massachusetts; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.953.513.50top 20% in Massachusetts; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.460.48bottom 41% in Massachusetts; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.538.245.8top 21% in Massachusetts; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.842.642.9top 40% in Massachusetts; top 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.45, RN 0.54, weekend 4.09. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alliance Health INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2022
Alliance Health Management Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Alliance Health Management Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2025
Brunetti, TammyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Calkins, AndrewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Corridan, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Dedham Institution for SavingsOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Dhaliwal, IqubalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Dhaliwal, IqubalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2025
Grady, FrancisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2013
Grady, FrancisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2016
Grady, FrancisIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
Gray, AlfredIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Janisko, JeromeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Jennings, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Jones, ErikIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Kemp, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Lavallee, ThomasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Mourtzinos, ArthurIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Riley, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Serenity Hill Nursing Center1.7 miWrentham, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Gardens at Cedarwood3.3 miFranklin, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Mount St Rita Health Centre5.2 miCumberland, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Madonna Manor Nursing Home5.5 miNorth Attleboro, MA★★★★☆3/5
Medway Country Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitat7.9 miMedway, MA—/5SFF
Garden Place Healthcare8.2 miAttleboro, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Foremost at Sharon LLC8.5 miSharon, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Thomas Upham House8.5 miMedfield, MA★★★★★4/5
Premier Healthcare at Harrington House8.7 miWalpole, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Woonsocket Health Center9.1 miWoonsocket, RI★★★★☆4/5
Adviniacare Oakland Grove LLC9.6 miWoonsocket, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Life Care Center of Attleboro10.0 miAttleboro, MA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Wrentham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225476.