How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
8000 Bass Lake Road, Crystal, MN 55428 (opens Google Maps) · Hennepin County · (763) 531-5000· 188 certified beds · avg 169 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 18, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
View all 25 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Feb 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Dec 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 17
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 17 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.34
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.92
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.05
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.34 | 4.83 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.92 | 1.22 | 0.69 | bottom 24% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.05 | 4.27 | 3.50 | bottom 42% in Minnesota; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 36% in Minnesota; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.2 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 17% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 38% in Minnesota; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.28, RN 0.90, weekend 3.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.28 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCP MN Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| Knobel, Reuven | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| MN HC Partnership 102 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| MN Holdings 102 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| New Hope HC LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| New Hope Operator Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/2024 |
| Rsyt 2024 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| Ryst 2024 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| Tarlow, Leon | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| The Alliven Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| Tsi Family Trust 2024 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2024 |
| 8000 Bass Lake Road LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Brady, Jaime | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Brady, Jaime | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Brady, Jaime | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| CCP MN Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Centralized Business Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| CHNH Consulting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Digacore Consulting | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
Showing 20 of 48 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 28 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Minnesota midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 48 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 92 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Ridge Health and Rehab | 0.5 mi | New Hope, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Maranatha Care Center | 2.3 mi | Brooklyn Center, MN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Terrace at Crystal LLC | 2.8 mi | Crystal, MN | —/5 | SFF | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community | 3.3 mi | Robbinsdale, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mission Nursing Home | 3.3 mi | Plymouth, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Good Samaritan Ambassador | 3.3 mi | New Hope, MN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Villas at Robbinsdale | 3.9 mi | Robbinsdale, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at Osseo LLC | 4.1 mi | Osseo, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake | 4.2 mi | Brooklyn Park, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Birches at Trillium Woods | 4.2 mi | Plymouth, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab Ctr | 4.3 mi | Golden Valley, MN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Allina Health Restorative Suites | 4.5 mi | Plymouth, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hennepin, MN — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Andrew Residence — Minneapolis, MN · overall 2/5
- Aurora on France — Edina, MN · overall 4/5
- Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Birchwood Care Home — Minneapolis, MN · overall 5/5
- Bywood East Health Care — Minneapolis, MN · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Catholic Eldercare on Main — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Chapel View Health Care Center — Hopkins, MN · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245518.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).