MinnesotaBrooklyn Park

Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake

9751 Regent Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 · Hennepin County · 64 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Jul 16, 2013

Part of chain: SAINT THERESE SENIOR COMMUNITIES (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 26, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost.
Feb 26, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Dec 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 16).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024140F
2026160E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.174.833.95top 33% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.201.220.69top 4% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.644.273.50top 27% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.510.690.48top 4% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.642.245.8top 13% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)19.438.642.9top 16% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.73, RN 2.01, weekend 4.24. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Saint Therese CommunitiesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/28/2019
Abbott, CraigIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Abbott, CraigIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Bremer Bank National AssociationOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2011
Delander, ChristineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2024
Delander, ChristineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Gillespie, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2012
Herb, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Hoffmann, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/09/2017
Hoffmann, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Horstmann, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2020
Krenn, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2011
McCluskey, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
McCrossan, JaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2012
Meads, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2015
Mittal, VikasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Mittal, VikasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Parmar, MonaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2018
Peterson, TessaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2024
Peterson, TessaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Maranatha Care Center2.1 miBrooklyn Center, MN★★★★☆4/5
The Villas at Osseo LLC2.4 miOsseo, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center LL3.5 miCoon Rapids, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center4.2 miCrystal, MN★★★☆☆3/5
The Estates at Fridley LLC4.4 miFridley, MN★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
North Ridge Health and Rehab4.6 miNew Hope, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center5.5 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community6.0 miRobbinsdale, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
The Terrace at Crystal LLC6.1 miCrystal, MN—/5SFF
The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC6.5 miAnoka, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck6.7 miNew Brighton, MN★★★☆☆2/5
The Birches at Trillium Woods6.8 miPlymouth, MN★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brooklyn Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245619.