How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
9751 Regent Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 (opens Google Maps) · Hennepin County · (763) 493-7007· 64 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Jul 16, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SAINT THERESE SENIOR COMMUNITIES (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · F-0627 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 16).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 16 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.17 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 33% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.20 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 4% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.64 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 27% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.51 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 4% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.6 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 13% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 19.4 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 16% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.73, RN 2.01, weekend 4.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Therese Communities | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/28/2019 |
| Abbott, Craig | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2022 |
| Abbott, Craig | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2022 |
| Bremer Bank National Association | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2011 |
| Delander, Christine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/04/2024 |
| Delander, Christine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Gillespie, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2012 |
| Herb, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Hoffmann, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2017 |
| Hoffmann, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Horstmann, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Krenn, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2011 |
| McCluskey, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| McCrossan, Jane | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2012 |
| Meads, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2015 |
| Mittal, Vikas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Mittal, Vikas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Parmar, Mona | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2018 |
| Peterson, Tessa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2024 |
| Peterson, Tessa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2024 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Saint Therese Senior Communities — 4 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maranatha Care Center | 2.1 mi | Brooklyn Center, MN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Villas at Osseo LLC | 2.4 mi | Osseo, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center LL | 3.5 mi | Coon Rapids, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | Crystal, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Estates at Fridley LLC | 4.4 mi | Fridley, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| North Ridge Health and Rehab | 4.6 mi | New Hope, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.5 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community | 6.0 mi | Robbinsdale, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Terrace at Crystal LLC | 6.1 mi | Crystal, MN | —/5 | SFF | |
| The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC | 6.5 mi | Anoka, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck | 6.7 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Birches at Trillium Woods | 6.8 mi | Plymouth, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hennepin, MN — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245619.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details