MinnesotaRobbinsdale

The Villas at Robbinsdale

3130 Grimes Avenue North, Robbinsdale, MN 55422 · Hennepin County · 75 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1987

Part of chain: MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (45 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$104,974
Fines, last 3 years
4.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 17, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 4, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 25, 2023 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 17, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jul 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023151J ▲
2024110F
2025110F
202631J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $104,974, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 17, 2026Fine$89,050
Aug 25, 2023Fine$15,924
Aug 25, 2023Payment Denial7 days from Sep 20, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.164.833.95bottom 24% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.971.220.69bottom 31% in Minnesota; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.684.273.50bottom 23% in Minnesota; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.690.48bottom 19% in Minnesota; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.942.245.8top 25% in Minnesota; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.238.642.9bottom 35% in Minnesota; bottom 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.80, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Halpert, MarcIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Jaffa, NoamIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Legum, JoshuaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Monarch Healthcare Operating Xii LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2023
Nij LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Spartan Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Stern, WilliamIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
WBS Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Yazoma Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Halpert, MarcIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Halpert, MarcIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Jaffa, NoamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Legum, JoshuaIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Stern, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community0.8 miRobbinsdale, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes TRP0.9 miGolden Valley, MN★★★★☆2/5
The Terrace at Crystal LLC1.2 miCrystal, MN—/5SFF
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab Ctr1.6 miGolden Valley, MN★★★★★5/5
Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC2.5 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Good Samaritan Ambassador2.6 miNew Hope, MN★★★★★5/5
The Villas at Brookview2.9 miGolden Valley, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center3.0 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Catholic Eldercare on Main3.4 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center3.9 miCrystal, MN★★★☆☆3/5
North Ridge Health and Rehab4.0 miNew Hope, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Jones Harrison Residence4.1 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Robbinsdale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245417.