How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Westhampton Care Center
78 Old Country Road, Westhampton, NY 11977 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 288-0101· 180 certified beds · avg 170 residents/day · certified since Mar 23, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jan 18, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 18, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 18, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 4, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jan 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.82
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.49
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.56
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.82 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 15% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 33% in New York; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.56 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 20% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 47% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.9 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 44% in New York; top 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 46% in New York; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.62, weekend 3.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Westhampton Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehm, Shlomo | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 80% | 01/01/2018 |
| Schlesinger, Ernest | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/01/2018 |
| Anreder, Lewis | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Anreder, Lewis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Anreder, Lewis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Boehm, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Brady, Kelly | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Brady, Kelly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Brady, Kelly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2019 |
| Hooper, Patrick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2019 |
| Hooper, Patrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2019 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Mazzie, Kristin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Mazzie, Kristin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Mazzie, Kristin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Montanaro, Jane | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Immaculatemarycenter for Rehabilitation&healthcare — Philadelphia, PA · overall 1/5
- St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Darby, PA · overall 1/5
- St Martha Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Downingtown, PA · overall 5/5
- St Mary Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Lansdale, PA · overall 4/5
- Villa at Stamford, the — Stamford, CT · overall 4/5
- Bishop McCarthy Center for Rehab & Healthcare — Vineland, NJ · overall 2/5
- Lincoln Park Care Center — Lincoln Park, NJ · overall 1/5
- Lincoln Park Renaissance — Lincoln Park, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 26 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oasis Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC | 5.3 mi | Center Moriches, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Acadia Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 7.2 mi | Riverhead, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care | 13.9 mi | Brookhaven, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Hamptons Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 15.1 mi | South Hampton, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Brookhaven Health Care Facility, LLC | 15.7 mi | East Patchogue, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Quantum Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC | 15.8 mi | Middle Island, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Surge Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC | 15.8 mi | Middle Island, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medford Multicare Center for Living | 16.1 mi | Medford, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Swan Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation | 17.0 mi | Patchogue, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Island Nursing and Rehab Center | 18.2 mi | Holtsville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Affinity Skilled Living and Rehabilitation Center — Oakdale, NY · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Allegria Nursing & Rehab Center of Port Jefferson — Port Jefferson Stati, NY · overall 1/5
- Apex Rehabilitation & Care Center — Huntington Station, NY · overall 3/5
- Berkshire Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — West Babylon, NY · overall 5/5
- Brookside Multicare Nursing Center — Smithtown, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335782.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).