California ›San Diego

VI at la Jolla Village

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

4171 Las Palmas Square, San Diego, CA 92122 (opens Google Maps) · San Diego County · (858) 646-3400· 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Jun 26, 2002 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified

Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: VI LIVING (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 28, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.50
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679

View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 12, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583
May 7, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Sep 22, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Sep 1, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Sep 1, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Sep 1, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Sep 1, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Nov 8, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201910D
202360E
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.50
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.14
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.05
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.504.313.95top 8% in California; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.140.610.69top 8% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.053.903.50top 6% in California; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.770.510.48top 12% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.636.745.8top 18% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.138.142.9top 24% in California; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.24, RN 1.08, weekend 4.81.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.24 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for VI at la Jolla Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CC Development Group II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—05/01/2026
CC la Jolla LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/03/1998
CC Living Holding Company LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—05/01/2026
Blys, EllenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/26/2015
Blys, EllenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/26/2015
Boudreau, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2011
Boudreau, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2011
Classic Residence Management Limited PartnershipOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/26/2005
Classic Residence Management Limited PartnershipOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2025
Cope, TaraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Cope, TaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Evraets, MelissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2020
Evraets, MelissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2020
Koszylko, TomekIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/15/2018
Koszylko, TomekIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/15/2018
Maslow, CaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Maslow, CaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Muszynski, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Muszynski, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Patterson, AmyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2023

Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain VI Living — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
  • "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
  • "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
  • "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
  • "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
  • "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 69 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Springs at Pacific Regent0.0 miSan Diego, CA★★★★★5/5
La Jolla Post-Acute2.1 miLa Jolla, CA★★★★☆4/5
The Cove at la Jolla3.7 miLa Jolla, CA★★★★★4/5
Kearny Mesa Convalescent and Nursing Home5.5 miSan Diego, CA★★★★★5/5
Bayshire Torrey Pines Post-Acute6.1 miSan Diego, CA★★★★★4/5
Helen Bernardy Center D/P SNF6.2 miSan Diego, CA★★★★★5/5
The Shores Post-Acute6.6 miSan Diego, CA★★★☆☆3/5
The Pavilion at Ocean Point8.0 miSan Diego, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Heights Healthcare Center8.7 miSan Diego, CA★★★★★4/5
Mission Hills Post Acute Care9.0 miSan Diego, CA★★★★☆3/5
Balboa Nursing & Rehabilitation Center9.4 miSan Diego, CA★★★★☆3/5
St. Pauls Health Care Center10.0 miSan Diego, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in San Diego, CA — 83 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in San Diego →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555793.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details