Villa Coronado D/P SNF

Name: Villa Coronado D/P SNF
Address: 233 PROSPECT PLACE, Coronado, CA, 92118, US
Telephone: 6195223900

233 Prospect Place, Coronado, CA 92118 · San Diego County · 122 certified beds · avg 90 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.55

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 2, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Jun 22, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 22, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	13	E
2024	6	E
2025	6	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.55	4.31	3.95	top 27% in California; top 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.08	0.61	0.69	top 9% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.28	3.90	3.50	top 22% in California; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.49	0.51	0.48	top 4% in California; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	20.1	36.7	45.8	top 8% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	14.0	38.1	42.9	top 10% in California; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.56, RN 1.79, weekend 7.11. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Sharp Healthcare	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/1994
Arendsee, Lindsey	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2023
Arendsee, Lindsey	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2023
Atis, Glend	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Atis, Glend	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Benjalil, Fahd	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Benjalil, Fahd	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Braun, Jane	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2024
Braun, Jane	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2024
Butera, Michael	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2020
Butera, Michael	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2020
Campbell, Robert	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2021
Campbell, Robert	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2021
Evans, William	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/30/2022
Evans, William	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2016
Fahid, Amir	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2021
Fahid, Amir	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/06/2026
Howard, Christopher	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Lennard, William	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022
Lennard, William	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
"Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
St. Pauls Health Care Center	2.8 mi	San Diego, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Balboa Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	3.3 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Golden Hill Post Acute	3.3 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Mission Hills Post Acute Care	3.5 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Hillcrest Heights Healthcare Center	3.8 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Hillcrest Manor Sanitarium	4.5 mi	National City, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
National City Post Acute	4.6 mi	National City, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Castle Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	4.7 mi	National City, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
The Pavilion at Ocean Point	5.0 mi	San Diego, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Arroyo Vista Nursing Center	5.0 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Paradise Valley Health Care	5.3 mi	National City, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Friendship Manor Nursing & Rehab Center	5.3 mi	National City, CA	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Coronado →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055074.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Villa Coronado D/P SNF

233 Prospect Place, Coronado, CA 92118 · 6195223900

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
☐ "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 055074 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)