La Jolla Post-Acute

2552 Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037 (opens Google Maps) · San Diego County · (858) 453-5810· 161 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Sep 30, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: COVENANT CARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Apr 24, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.01

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 43 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 24, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
Apr 24, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. F-0638
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. F-0636

View all 43 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 24, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Apr 24, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638
Apr 24, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Apr 24, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Apr 24, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Apr 24, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Apr 24, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Mar 3, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578
Apr 17, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
Apr 17, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Apr 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Apr 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
Jan 10, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Oct 6, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Oct 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Apr 8, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · F-0573
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Apr 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Aug 9, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698
Aug 9, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 9, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (17 → 7).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2019

2022

2023

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	11	E
2022	17	E
2023	2	E
2024	5	E
2025	8	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

4.01

4.31

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.48

0.61

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.73

3.90

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.01	4.31	3.95	bottom 42% in California; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.48	0.61	0.69	bottom 50% in California; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.73	3.90	3.50	bottom 48% in California; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.39	0.51	0.48	top 47% in California; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	49.3	36.7	45.8	bottom 16% in California; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	71.4	38.1	42.9	bottom 7% in California; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.47, weekend 3.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for La Jolla Post-Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Centre Capital Investors V, LP	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Centre Covenant Purchaser (b), LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Centre Covenant Purchaser (q), LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Centre Covenant Purchaser (s), LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/19/2008
Centre V Secondary Fund, L.P.	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Covenant Care California, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	07/17/2008
Covenant Care, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Covenant Holdco, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Covenant Subco, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Evans, Mary	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Levin, Robert	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Sims, Christine	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
State Treasurer of Mich Custodian of Public School Empl RTMNT Systems	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/19/2008
Stockwell Fund II LP	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Torok, Andrew	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	07/17/2008
Ashley, Dava	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2018
Ashley, Dava	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/26/2018
Carney, Kevin	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2013
Evans, Mary	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2013
Evans, Mary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/14/2006

Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Covenant Care — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Los Altos Post-Acute — Los Altos, CA · overall 3/5
Pacific Coast Manor — Capitola, CA · overall 5/5
Pacific Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Fresno, CA · overall 3/5
Palo Alto Post-Acute — Palo Alto, CA · overall 4/5
Shoreline Care Center — Oxnard, CA · overall 2/5
Silver Hills Health Care Center — Las Vegas, NV · overall 2/5
Silver Ridge Healthcare Center — Las Vegas, NV · overall 4/5
Buena Vista Care Center — Santa Barbara, CA · overall 2/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
"How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
"How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the California midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 65 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
The Cove at la Jolla	1.6 mi	La Jolla, CA	★★★★★	4/5
The Springs at Pacific Regent	2.1 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	5/5
VI at la Jolla Village	2.1 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Kearny Mesa Convalescent and Nursing Home	5.8 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Helen Bernardy Center D/P SNF	6.8 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	5/5
The Pavilion at Ocean Point	7.0 mi	San Diego, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Shores Post-Acute	7.0 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Bayshire Torrey Pines Post-Acute	7.3 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Hillcrest Heights Healthcare Center	8.4 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Mission Hills Post Acute Care	8.7 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Balboa Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	9.2 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
St. Pauls Health Care Center	9.7 mi	San Diego, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in San Diego, CA — 83 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

La Mesa Healthcare Center — La Mesa, CA · overall 5/5
La Paloma Healthcare Center — Oceanside, CA · overall 5/5
Lakeside Special Care Center — Lakeside, CA · overall 5/5
Lemon Grove Care and Rehabilitation Center — Lemon Grove, CA · overall 3/5
Magnolia Post Acute Care — El Cajon, CA · overall 3/5abuse
Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community — Escondido, CA · overall 5/5
Mount Miguel Covenant Village — Spring Valley, CA · overall 3/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in La Jolla →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056017.