MichiganBay City

Hampton Nursing and Rehabilitation

800 Mulholland Road, Bay City, MI 48708 · Bay County · 51 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1981

Part of chain: PREFERRED CARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.20
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 26, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Jul 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
202480E
202590F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.204.323.95bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.120.840.69top 19% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.843.793.50bottom 3% in Michigan; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.760.490.48top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.944.145.8top 45% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.639.242.9top 29% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.00, RN 1.05, weekend 2.66. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Green, DovIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest35%03/15/2023
Hampton Opco Holding LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/15/2023
Klein, YoniIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest40%03/15/2023
Schnell, DavidIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%03/15/2023
Ahmed, NaeemIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Green, DovIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Hampton Propco Holding LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Hampton Propco Holding LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Klein, YoniIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Klein, YoniIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
P&M Holding Group LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Preferred Care at Lansing MNGT LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Rubinfeld, EliIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Schild, TheodoraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Schild, TheodoraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Schnell, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2023
Zigdon & Associates PCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center3.0 miBay City, MI★★★★☆3/5
Bay County Medical Care Facility4.0 miEssexville, MI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Carriage House Nursing and Rehabilitation4.6 miBay City, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Caretel Inns of Tri-Cities5.1 miBay City, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Huron Woods Nursing Center9.4 miKawkawlin, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Great Lakes Rehabilitation Center9.6 miSaginaw, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Hoyt Nursing & Rehab Centre10.6 miSaginaw, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Saginaw Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC11.4 miSaginaw, MI★★★★☆3/5
Adira Nursing and Rehabilitation11.7 miSaginaw, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Covenant Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation at Wel12.3 miSaginaw, MI★★★★☆3/5
Healthsource Saginaw, INC12.7 miSaginaw, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Avista Nursing and Rehabilitation14.3 miSaginaw, MI★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bay City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235411.