How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Willows at Ramapo Rehab and Nursing Center
30 Cragmere Road, Suffern, NY 10901 (opens Google Maps) · Rockland County · (845) 357-1230· 203 certified beds · avg 186 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 13, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 24, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 24, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 24, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. F-0567
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 24, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Oct 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 12 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.02
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.37
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.72
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.02 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.37 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.72 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 31% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in New York; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.7 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 21% in New York; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.5 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 38% in New York; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.24, RN 0.40, weekend 2.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.24 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Willows at Ramapo Rehab and Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahuja, Sanjay | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 08/01/2006 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 07/01/2012 |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 07/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 07/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 07/01/2012 |
| Mohan, Namita | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 08/01/2006 |
| Mudgil, Vanita | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 08/01/2006 |
| Zimiles, Joseph | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 08/01/2006 |
| Zucker, Yossie | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Ahuja, Sanjay | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Ahuja, Sanjay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2006 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Green-Rivers, Kelly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation a — Port Jefferson, NY · overall 2/5
- Bethany Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC — Nashville, TN · overall 1/5
- Creekside Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Madison, TN · overall 4/5
- Gallatin Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Gallatin, TN · overall 4/5
- Green Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Nashville, TN · overall 3/5
- Lebanon Center for Rehabilitation and Healing, LLC — Lebanon, TN · overall 5/5
- Manchester Center for Rehabilitation and Healing L — Manchester, TN · overall 4/5
- Nashville Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LL — Nashville, TN · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 106 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Metropolitan Res Health Care Facility INC | 3.2 mi | Monsey, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Allendale Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.0 mi | Allendale, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodcliff Lake Health & Rehabilitation Center | 4.9 mi | Woodcliff Lake, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pine Valley Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 5.2 mi | Spring Valley, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Friedwald Center for Rehab and Nursing, L L C | 5.9 mi | New City, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Northern Manor Geriatric Center INC | 6.0 mi | Nanuet, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Family of Caring at Park Ridge LLC | 6.6 mi | Park Ridge, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ridgewood Center | 7.7 mi | Ridgewood, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Christian Health Care Center | 8.5 mi | Wyckoff, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bergen New Bridge Medical Center | 9.2 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Family of Caring Healthcare at Ridgewood | 9.3 mi | Ridgewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 9.4 mi | Oakland, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Rockland, NY — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Tolstoy Foundation Rehabilitation and Nrsg Center — Valley Cottage, NY · overall 1/5SFF
- Helen Hayes Hospital R H C F — West Haverstraw, NY · overall 5/5
- Helen Hayes Hospital T C U — West Haverstraw, NY · overall 5/5
- Northern Riverview Health Care, INC — Haverstraw, NY · overall 2/5
- Nyack Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Valley Cottage, NY · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335148.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).