CaliforniaPalm Desert

The Springs Healthcare Center at the Carlotta

41505 Carlotta Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92211 · Riverside County · 59 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since May 27, 1986

Part of chain: ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 27, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
Feb 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Feb 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
2024101G ▲
202590E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.824.313.95bottom 28% in California; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.610.69bottom 38% in California; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.483.903.50bottom 28% in California; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.510.48bottom 34% in California; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.036.745.8bottom 25% in California; bottom 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.738.142.9top 13% in California; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.60, RN 0.51, weekend 4.19. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Apdc, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/16/2023
Bradshaw, PeterIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Elsner, EricIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Kirkwood, JaredIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Orgill, CraigIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Parti, RajeshIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Parti, ShrutyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Paxman, MarcusIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Apdc, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Apdc, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Aspen Healthcare Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Bradshaw, JeffreyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/08/2026
Bradshaw, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Brady, VernIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Case, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Caslmon, TimothyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Caslmon, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Caslmon, TimothyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
East West BankOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2023
Epc Trevi LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Monterey Palms Health Care Center3.2 miPalm Desert, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Rancho Mirage Health and Rehabilitation Center3.5 miRancho Mirage, CA★★★★☆4/5
Desert Springs Post Acute5.7 miPalm Desert, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bayshire Rancho Mirage5.8 miRancho Mirage, CA★★★★☆4/5
Desert Mountain Care Center6.3 miIndio, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Desert Springs Healthcare & Wellness Centre6.5 miIndio, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Premier Care Center for Palm Springs10.9 miPalm Springs, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Palm Springs Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center12.0 miPalm Springs, CA★★★★☆4/5
Desert Regional Medical Center D/P SNF13.6 miPalm Springs, CA★★★★★4/5
California Nursing & Rehabilitation Center14.0 miPalm Springs, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Palm Desert →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555226.