University Post-Acute Rehab

Name: University Post-Acute Rehab
Address: 2120 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA, 95817, US
Telephone: 9164526631

2120 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817 · Sacramento County · 59 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Jun 10, 1987

Part of chain: ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.23

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jun 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jun 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 28, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2022	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Jan 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	9	F
2023	1	D
2024	7	E
2025	9	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.23	4.31	3.95	top 43% in California; top 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.20	0.61	0.69	top 7% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.92	3.90	3.50	top 38% in California; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.11	0.51	0.48	top 7% in California; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	31.9	36.7	45.8	top 37% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	33.3	38.1	42.9	top 40% in California; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.55, RN 1.29, weekend 4.22. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Assb, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/12/2024
Bradshaw, Peter	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Elsner, Eric	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Kirkwood, Jared	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Orgill, Craig	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Parti, Rajesh	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Parti, Shruty	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Paxman, Marcus	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Aspen Healthcare Services LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Assb, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Assb, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Batalla, Amel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2014
Batalla, Amel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2014
Bradshaw, Jeffrey	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/09/2026
Bradshaw, Jeffrey	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Brady, Vern	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Case, Ryan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Jurado, Frank	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2024
Pantovich, Jeremy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2014
Pantovich, Jeremy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Saylor Lane Healthcare Center	0.6 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
McKinley Park Care Center	1.0 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Mid-Town Oaks Post-Acute	1.1 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Sherwood Healthcare Center	1.8 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Pioneer House	2.5 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Advanced Health Care of Sacramento	2.8 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2.9 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Bridgewood Post Acute	3.1 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Woodside Healthcare Center	3.1 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Cedarwood Post Acute	3.7 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Capital Post Acute	4.0 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
River Bend Nursing Center	4.5 mi	West Sacramento, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sacramento →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555265.

The Care File

Visit checklist — University Post-Acute Rehab

2120 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817 · 9164526631

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555265 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)