CaliforniaPalm Springs

Palm Springs Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

277 S Sunrise Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 · Riverside County · 99 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Feb 2, 1973

Part of chain: MARINER HEALTH CARE (17 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.84
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Sep 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Sep 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201960D
202370E
202490E
202550E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.844.313.95bottom 30% in California; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.850.610.69top 15% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.533.903.50bottom 33% in California; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.930.510.48top 9% in California; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.236.745.8bottom 35% in California; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.438.142.9bottom 23% in California; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.10, RN 1.13, weekend 4.68. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
GC Holding Company 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest99%06/30/2015
Grancare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
Grunstein, EmilyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/06/2019
Mariner Health Care, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
MHC Holding CompanyOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
MHC West Holding CompanyOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
National Senior Care, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
Abusamrah Salaimeh, AbdallahIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Abusamrah Salaimeh, AbdallahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Nassar, NicolasIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Nassar, NicolasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Palm Springs Holding Company GP LLCOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2015
Pottroff, DenniseIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/12/2023
Pottroff, DenniseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Sawyer, MellowIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Sawyer, MellowIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2024
Sotolong, PatriciaIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Sotolong, PatriciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Taetz, LindaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Premier Care Center for Palm Springs1.2 miPalm Springs, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Desert Regional Medical Center D/P SNF1.7 miPalm Springs, CA★★★★★4/5
California Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.4 miPalm Springs, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bayshire Rancho Mirage6.7 miRancho Mirage, CA★★★★☆4/5
Rancho Mirage Health and Rehabilitation Center8.6 miRancho Mirage, CA★★★★☆4/5
Monterey Palms Health Care Center10.4 miPalm Desert, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Desert Springs Post Acute11.5 miPalm Desert, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Springs Healthcare Center at the Carlotta12.0 miPalm Desert, CA★★★★★4/5
Desert Mountain Care Center18.2 miIndio, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Desert Springs Healthcare & Wellness Centre18.4 miIndio, CA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Palm Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056229.