CaliforniaRiverside

Alta Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre

9020 Garfield Street, Riverside, CA 92503 · Riverside County · 99 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1973

Part of chain: CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 23, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 23, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 23, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021170E
202340E
202450E
202580D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.564.313.95bottom 13% in California; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.290.610.69bottom 10% in California; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.283.903.50bottom 15% in California; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.510.48bottom 28% in California; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.036.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 0.34, weekend 3.83. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Br Oceangate LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Citrus Wellness Centre, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest72%10/01/2009
Katz Kindred Healthcare PartnershipOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Kindred Realty PartnershipOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Majer, SolIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Weiss, JonathanIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Eretz Alta Vista Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Rechnitz, ShlomoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Rockport Administrative Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Rockport Administrative Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2025
Scott, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2020
Scott, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2020
Sharobiem, AndroIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Sharobiem, AndroIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Villa Health Care Center0.2 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Mission Care Center0.6 miRiverside, CA★★★★★5/5
Riverwalk Post Acute0.8 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Citrus Grove Post Acute0.9 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Extended Care Hospital of Riverside1.2 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Woodcrest Post Acute & Rehabilitation1.2 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Arlington Gardens Care Center2.3 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Valencia Gardens Health Care Center2.7 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Community Care and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Palm Terrace Care Center3.5 miRiverside, CA★★★★☆3/5
Riverside Postacute Care3.8 miRiverside, CA—/5abuseSFF
Community Care on Palm4.3 miRiverside, CA★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Riverside →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055042.