CaliforniaCamarillo

Alta Healthcare Center of Camarillo

6000 Santa Rosa Road, Camarillo, CA 93012 · Ventura County · 45 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since May 9, 2012

Part of chain: ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$43,407
Fines, last 3 years
4.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 13, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
May 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340F
2024131G ▲
202550D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $43,407.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 13, 2024Fine$43,407

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.184.313.95top 46% in California; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.560.610.69top 38% in California; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.673.903.50bottom 44% in California; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.560.510.48top 25% in California; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.936.745.8bottom 30% in California; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)12.538.142.9top 8% in California; top 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.32, RN 0.71, weekend 4.68. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Acsr, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/03/2021
Aspen Skilled Healthcare INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Bradshaw, PeterIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2023
Elsner, EricIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Kirkwood, JaredIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Orgill, CraigIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Parti, RajeshIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Parti, ShrutyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Paxman, MarcusIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Sacc LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Acsr, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Acsr, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2021
Aspen Healthcare Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Bejarano, JavierIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Bejarano, JavierIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Bradshaw, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Brady, VernIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Case, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Caslmon, TimothyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Caslmon, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St. John's Hospital Camarillo D/P SNF2.0 miCamarillo, CA★★★★★5/5
Camarillo Healthcare Center3.5 miCamarillo, CA★★★★★4/5
Mary Health of the Sick Convalescent & Nursing Hos4.4 miNewbury Park, CA★★★★★4/5
Oakview Skilled Nursing6.3 miThousand Oaks, CA★★★★★5/5
Thousand Oaks Post Acute, LLC6.3 miThousand Oaks, CA★★★★☆4/5
Sherwood Oaks Post Acute9.6 miThousand Oaks, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Santa Paula Post Acute Center9.9 miSanta Paula, CA★★★★☆4/5
Glenwood Care Center10.9 miOxnard, CA★★★★★5/5
Maywood Acres Healthcare11.4 miOxnard, CA★★★★★5/5
Oxnard Manor Healthcare Center11.4 miOxnard, CA★★★★★4/5
Shoreline Care Center12.0 miOxnard, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Greenfield Care Center of Fillmore, LLC12.2 miFillmore, CA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Camarillo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555876.