How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
5606 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 851-1000· 79 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SHIMON LEFKOWITZ (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Nov 26, 2021 · F-0604
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 21, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. F-0676
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Nov 26, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 11 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.10 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 40% in New York; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.79 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in New York; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 35% in New York; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.8 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 41% in New York; top 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 18% in New York; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.23, RN 0.66, weekend 2.91.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.23 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Heritage Rehabilitation and Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lefkowitz, Chani | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2009 |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 98% | 01/01/2008 |
| Badin, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Badin, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2025 |
| Binder, Zev | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2022 |
| Binder, Zev | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2025 |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Shimon Lefkowitz — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norwegian Christian Home and Health Center | 0.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 0.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Palm Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 1.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Caton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, LLC | 1.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ditmas Park Care Center | 1.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Haym Solomon Home for the Aged | 2.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Chateau at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335104.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details