How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Chateau at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing
3457 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11229 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 535-5100· 189 certified beds · avg 184 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 21, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. F-0567
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint F-0602
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| May 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 24, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 24, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jun 24, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.39
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.54
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.17
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.39 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in New York; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in New York; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.17 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in New York; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 32% in New York; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.6 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 33% in New York; top 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 53.7 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 21% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.97, RN 0.68, weekend 2.69.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.97 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Chateau at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 08/04/2016 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 08/04/2016 |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 08/04/2016 |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2016 |
| Feldstein, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Feldstein, Jack | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2016 |
| Humphrey, Wendy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2017 |
| Humphrey, Wendy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2017 |
| Janani, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Janani, Jack | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2016 |
| Zucker, Yossie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2016 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Peekskill, NY · overall 3/5
- The Enclave at Rye Rehab and Nursing Ctr — Port Chester, NY · overall 5/5
- The Grand Pavilion for Rehab & Nursing at Rockvill — Rockville Centre, NY · overall 3/5
- The Grove at Valhalla Rehab and Nursing Center — Valhalla, NY · overall 2/5
- The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center at — Nesconset, NY · overall 5/5
- The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- The Paramount at Somers Rehab and Nursing Center — Somers, NY · overall 2/5abuse
- The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 236 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheepshead Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Menorah Home & Hospital for Aged & Infirm | 1.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Shore View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Haym Solomon Home for the Aged | 2.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ditmas Park Care Center | 2.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sea Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing and Rehabilitation C | 3.2 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 3.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Heritage Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 3.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Palm Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Seagate Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 2/5
- Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential — Brooklyn, NY · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335290.