How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Great Neck
15 St Pauls Place, Great Neck, NY 11021 (opens Google Maps) · Nassau County · (516) 466-3001· 214 certified beds · avg 211 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE GRAND HEALTHCARE (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 18, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 1, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 1, 2022 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 1, 2022 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 3, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
View all 24 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
| Apr 1, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Oct 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Oct 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 18, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 12 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.86
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.36
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.65
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.86 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in New York; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.36 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 9% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.65 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 27% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 6% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 15.2 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 1% in New York; top 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 24% in New York; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.07, RN 0.39, weekend 2.85.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Great Neck. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 95% | 01/01/2019 |
| Strauss, Meryl | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2019 |
| Mozorosky, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Mozorosky, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Schwartz, Elliott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Schwartz, Elliott | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Grand Healthcare — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Mohawk — Ilion, NY · overall 1/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Pawling — Pawling, NY · overall 2/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Queens — Whitesone, NY · overall 4/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Rome — Rome, NY · overall 1/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin — Island Park, NY · overall 3/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica — Utica, NY · overall 1/5SFF
- Bridge View Nursing Home — Whitestone, NY · overall 4/5
- Delaware Oaks Center for Rehabilitation and Nursin — Buffalo, NY · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How quickly are lab tests done and results acted on when a resident's doctor orders them?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 15% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 244 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwell Health Stern Family Center for Rehabilit | 1.3 mi | Manhasset, NY | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck | 1.5 mi | Great Neck, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Little Neck Care Center | 1.9 mi | Little Neck, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care & Rehab | 2.5 mi | New Hyde Park, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| New Glen Oaks Nursing Home, INC | 2.9 mi | Glen Oaks, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Mary's Hospital for Children | 3.1 mi | Bayside, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ozanam Hall of Queens Nursing Home INC | 3.4 mi | Bayside, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sands Point Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 3.9 mi | Port Washington, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunharbor Manor | 4.0 mi | Roslyn Heights, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Windsor Park Rehab & Nursing Center | 4.4 mi | Queens Village, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Queens | 4.4 mi | Whitesone, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Bridge View Nursing Home | 4.7 mi | Whitestone, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Nassau, NY — 36 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin — Island Park, NY · overall 3/5
- Townhouse Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing — Uniondale, NY · overall 3/5
- White Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Woodbury, NY · overall 3/5
- Woodbury Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Woodbury, NY · overall 1/5
- A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility — Uniondale, NY · overall 1/5abuse
- Beach Terrace Care Center — Long Beach, NY · overall 3/5
- Belair Care Center INC — Bellmore, NY · overall 5/5
- Central Island Healthcare — Plainview, NY · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335483.