New YorkUniondale

A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility

875 Jerusalem Avenue, Uniondale, NY 11553 · Nassau County · 589 certified beds · avg 454 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
7
Serious findings on record
$141,265
Fines, last 3 years
3.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 30, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 23, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 23, 2025 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 9, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 9, 2022 · F-0740

The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 30, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 2, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 30, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 23, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 9, 2022▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 9, 2022▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Mar 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202232K ▲
202481G ▲
2025103J ▲
202611J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $141,265, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 30, 2025Fine$14,777
May 23, 2025Fine$113,140
Apr 2, 2024Fine$13,348
Apr 2, 2024Payment Denial92 days from Jul 2, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.063.583.95bottom 29% in New York; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.660.680.69top 36% in New York; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.633.133.50bottom 25% in New York; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.480.48top 47% in New York; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)15.740.345.8top 2% in New York; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.039.842.9top 13% in New York; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.79, RN 0.61, weekend 2.40. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - State

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cohen, SteveIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Deluca, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Gallo, VictorIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Heatley, RobertIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Kumar, KrishanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Maher, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Marie-Hanson, JemmaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Martello, Greg-PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Mirotznik, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Politi, VictorIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Reed, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Rehman, AsifIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Sussman, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Venditto, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Zucaro, AndrewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015
Zysman, WarrenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hempstead Park Nursing Home1.3 miHempstead, NY★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Townhouse Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing1.6 miUniondale, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Mayfair Care Center1.7 miHempstead, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Fulton Commons Care Center INC1.8 miEast Meadow, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Belair Care Center INC2.3 miBellmore, NY★★★★★4/5
Nassau Rehabilitation & Nursing Center2.3 miHempstead, NY★★★☆☆3/5
South Shore Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.1 miFreeport, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Meadowbrook Care Center3.1 miFreeport, NY★★★★★4/5
Mount Sinai South Nassau T C U3.9 miOceanside, NY★★★★★5/5
Rockville Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center,4.1 miRockville Center, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Uniondale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335023.