How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
42 41 201st Street, Bayside, NY 11361 (opens Google Maps) · Queens County · (718) 423-2000· 432 certified beds · avg 406 residents/day · certified since Sep 10, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED AND INFIRMED (3 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jul 19, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jul 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jul 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 21, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.56 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 42% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 18% in New York; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.33 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 31% in New York; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 18% in New York; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.3 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 30% in New York; top 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 24.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 18% in New York; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.82, weekend 3.26.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.49 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ozanam Hall of Queens Nursing Home INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/14/1967 |
| Roman Catholic Disocese of Brooklyn | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 03/18/1969 |
| Bowden, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Bowden, Mary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Bowden, Mary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Brennan, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2021 |
| Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/1967 |
| Devlin, Leslee | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2007 |
| Domino, Leda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Fonti, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/09/2023 |
| Gathers, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Haley, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Haley, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Heery, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Heery, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Kasper, Rose | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Keating, Patrick | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/27/2020 |
| Lynch, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/1989 |
| McAleer, Marty | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| McWeeney, Brian | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirmed — 3 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Mary's Hospital for Children | 0.8 mi | Bayside, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Queens | 1.9 mi | Whitesone, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Elmhurst Care Center, INC, | 2.1 mi | East Elmhurst, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Bridge View Nursing Home | 2.2 mi | Whitestone, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Pavilion at Queens for Rehabilitation & Nursin | 2.4 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Long Island Care Center INC | 2.4 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Franklin Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.4 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sapphire Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing of Ce | 2.4 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Little Neck Care Center | 2.5 mi | Little Neck, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Waterview Nursing Care Center | 2.5 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodcrest Rehab & Residential H C Center, L L C | 2.5 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cliffside Rehab & Residential Health Care Center | 2.5 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Queens, NY — 56 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335363.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details