OklahomaBethany

The Grand at Bethany Skilled Nursing and Therapy

7000 Northwest 32nd Street, Bethany, OK 73008 · Oklahoma County · 161 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Oct 19, 1990

Part of chain: BRIDGES HEALTH (33 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$22,919
Fines, last 3 years
4.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 27, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 27, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 9, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Aug 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024191G ▲
202562J ▲
202640D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $22,919.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 27, 2025Fine$14,901
Sep 3, 2024Fine$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.594.583.95top 46% in Oklahoma; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.410.69bottom 46% in Oklahoma; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.864.163.50bottom 32% in Oklahoma; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.280.48top 38% in Oklahoma; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.155.545.8top 44% in Oklahoma; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.353.642.9top 5% in Oklahoma; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.29, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bridges Employee Stock Ownership TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/31/2020
Amity Care, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2025
Bethlinwood, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1998
Boone, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Boone, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Calfe, AutumnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Calfe, AutumnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Coble, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Deroin, KristyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Deroin, KristyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Dimond, MichaelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2025
Duncan, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2022
FLP, L.L.C.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2025
Griffin, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Griffin, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Kenneth D. Greiner III Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Long, DennisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Orix Real Estate Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2014
Renew Properties, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Park0.8 miBethany, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Windsor Hills Nursing Center1.5 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Heritage Manor1.6 miOklahoma City, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Warr Acres Nursing Center2.5 miOklahoma City, OK★★★☆☆3/5
North Winds Living Center2.9 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Ignite Medical Resort Okc, LLC3.6 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Bellevue Health & Rehabilitation Center3.7 miOklahoma City, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Fairmont Skilled Nursing and Therapy3.9 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Lodge at Brookline3.9 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
St. Ann's Skilled Nursing and Therapy4.3 miOklahoma City, OK★★★★☆4/5
The Health Center at Concordia4.3 miOklahoma City, OK★★★★★5/5
The Lakes4.3 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bethany →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375107.