OklahomaOklahoma City

Wildewood Skilled Nursing and Therapy

1913 Northeast 50th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73111 · Oklahoma County · 107 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Feb 16, 2000

Part of chain: BRIDGES HEALTH (33 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 29, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jun 29, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 29, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230E
202330E
2024100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.744.583.95top 37% in Oklahoma; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.640.410.69top 11% in Oklahoma; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.224.163.50top 44% in Oklahoma; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.280.48top 31% in Oklahoma; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.755.545.8top 36% in Oklahoma; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.353.642.9top 5% in Oklahoma; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.48, weekend 3.15. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bridges Employee Stock Ownership TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/31/2020
Bridges Esop, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2020
Deroin, KristyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Kingwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy2.1 miOklahoma City, OK★★★★☆3/5
The Wilshire Skilled Nursing and Therapy2.4 miOklahoma City, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Park Place Healthcare and Rehab2.7 miOklahoma City, OK—/5SFF
Mid-Del Skilled Nursing and Therapy4.4 miDel City, OK★★★★☆4/5
Northwest Nursing Center4.8 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
The Lodge at Brookline5.0 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Tuscany Village Nursing Center5.7 miOklahoma City, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ignite Medical Resort Okc, LLC5.9 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
North Winds Living Center5.9 miOklahoma City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Bellevue Health & Rehabilitation Center5.9 miOklahoma City, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Oklahoma City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375383.