Connecticut ›Plantsville

Summit at Plantsville Center for Health & Rehabili

261 Summit Street, Plantsville, CT 06479 · Capitol County · 150 certified beds · avg 146 residents/day · certified since Nov 22, 1999

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$3,652
Fines, last 3 years
3.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 9, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Jul 9, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jan 9, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Aug 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 20, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 20, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (19 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130E
202320F
2024220E
2025141G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $3,652.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 8, 2025Fine$3,652

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.663.803.95bottom 47% in Connecticut; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.700.69bottom 25% in Connecticut; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.363.433.50top 45% in Connecticut; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.460.48bottom 4% in Connecticut; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.737.445.8bottom 42% in Connecticut; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.138.642.9bottom 34% in Connecticut; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.45, weekend 3.29. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
BG II Opco ML LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/10/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
David Ostreicher Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Dymer Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Ehrenfeld, MindyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Ilana Ostreicher Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Juniper Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Lopiansky, RebeccaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Oak Management Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Ostreicher, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Ostreicher, MarvinIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Ostreicher, MichelleIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Shayna Steg Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Steg, ShaynaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Steg, YitzchokIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Weisz, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Ysro TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Zadun II Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/10/2024
Baker Tilly Advisory Group LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Southington Care Center0.9 miSouthington, CT★★★★★5/5
Livewell Connecticut1.4 miPlantsville, CT★★★★★4/5
Civita Care Center at Cheshire5.1 miCheshire, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Cheshire House Health Care Facility & Rehab Center5.5 miWaterbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion6.0 miMeriden, CT★★★★★4/5
Village Green Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.1 miBristol, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Pines at Bristol for Nursing & Rehabilitation, the6.3 miBristol, CT★★★★☆3/5
Meriden Health and Rehab6.3 miMeriden, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Civita Care Sheriden Woods6.3 miBristol, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Curtis Home St Elizabeth Center, the6.3 miMeriden, CT★☆☆☆☆2/5
Silver Springs Care Center6.4 miMeriden, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Ingraham Manor Rehab and Nursing6.6 miBristol, CT★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Plantsville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075420.