ConnecticutMeriden

Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion

320 Colony Street, Meriden, CT 06451 · Capitol County · 30 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Mar 3, 2006

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,278
Fines, last 3 years
4.60
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 5, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Feb 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 5, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Mar 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
May 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 11, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 14, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 14, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120E
202380E
202550E
202631G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,278.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 5, 2026Fine$8,278

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.603.803.95top 15% in Connecticut; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.340.700.69top 7% in Connecticut; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.003.433.50top 18% in Connecticut; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.890.460.48top 7% in Connecticut; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.237.445.8top 8% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)11.138.642.9top 6% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.07, RN 1.18, weekend 3.54. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bogdanski - Bourdan, SarahIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Carabetta, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Curry, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Feest, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2013
Fraser, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2021
Gulino, RosarioIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2021
Haberli, EdwardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Kane, DianeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/02/2006
Martell, CliffordIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1999
Martell, CliffordIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1999
McGoldrick, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Miller, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2023
Miller, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2023
Miller, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2023
Sarrazin, MarciaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Suzio Munson, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2021
Thibeault, WendyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2021
Vumbaco, GeorgeannIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2016
Zygmont-Ross, ChristineIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Meriden Health and Rehab0.8 miMeriden, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Curtis Home St Elizabeth Center, the1.4 miMeriden, CT★☆☆☆☆2/5
Silver Springs Care Center1.5 miMeriden, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Apple Rehab Coccomo2.7 miMeriden, CT★☆☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Meriden2.8 miMeriden, CT★★★★☆3/5
Connecticut Baptist Homes, INC3.0 miMeriden, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Southington Care Center5.4 miSouthington, CT★★★★★5/5
Livewell Connecticut5.5 miPlantsville, CT★★★★★4/5
Civita Care Center at Cheshire5.6 miCheshire, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Ledgecrest Health Care Center5.9 miKensington, CT★★★★☆4/5
Summit at Plantsville Center for Health & Rehabili6.0 miPlantsville, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Apple Rehab Cromwell6.0 miCromwell, CT★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Meriden →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075439.