Augusta Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC
188 Eastern Ave, Augusta, ME 04330 · Kennebec County · 72 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1992
Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 14, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 3, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (30)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 5, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| May 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| May 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| May 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| May 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| May 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| May 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 10 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Maine avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.79 | 4.60 | 3.95 | bottom 12% in Maine; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.69 | bottom 42% in Maine; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.46 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Maine; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.48 | bottom 37% in Maine; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.3 | 46.7 | 45.8 | top 13% in Maine; top 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 40.2 | 42.9 | bottom 48% in Maine; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 1.03, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bokow, Barry | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Geffner, Ira | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Gluck, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Lobell, Jonah | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Lowinger, Ben | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Lowinger, Joseph | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Marvin Ostreicher Family Trust 2012 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Meridian Capital Foundation | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Mso Associates LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, David | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, Susan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Schoor, Kalman | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Steg, Yitzchok | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Susan Ostreicher Family Trust 2012 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ventas NHV Fund | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| VK Health Facilities LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2013 |
| Weinstock, Abraham | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Almeida, Elizabeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What adaptive eating equipment do you provide, and how do you decide who needs help at meals?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mainegeneral Rehab & Long Term Care - Glenridge | 0.6 mi | Augusta, ME | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mainegeneral Rehab & Long Term Care - Gray Birch | 2.3 mi | Augusta, ME | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Maine Veterans Home - Augusta | 3.4 mi | Augusta, ME | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lakewood a Continuing Care Center | 16.9 mi | Waterville, ME | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oak Grove Center | 17.4 mi | Waterville, ME | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Waterville Center for Health and Rehab | 19.2 mi | Waterville, ME | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205077.