CaliforniaVallejo

Springs Road Healthcare

1527 Springs Rd, Vallejo, CA 94591 · Solano County · 65 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1974

Part of chain: BVHC, LLC (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360D
202430D
202560E
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.304.313.95top 38% in California; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.610.69top 40% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.953.903.50top 36% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.510.48top 37% in California; top 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)19.736.745.8top 7% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)12.538.142.9top 8% in California; top 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.50, weekend 3.65. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Airey, ConnorIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Airey, ConnorIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Anierdes, Princes ValerieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Anierdes, Princes ValerieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Ballesteros, FranciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Ballesteros, FranciaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Calabazaron, RedentorIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2022
Calabazaron, RedentorIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2022
Dhugga, GurpreetIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Dhugga, GurpreetIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Espinoza, DesireIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/18/2025
Espinoza, DesireIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/18/2025
Secena, EdgarIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Secena, EdgarIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Thapa, NischalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2024
Thapa, NischalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heartwood Avenue Healthcare1.1 miVallejo, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Solano Post Acute1.7 miVallejo, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Alhambra Post Acute8.7 miMartinez, CA★★★★★4/5
Greenridge Post Acute10.7 miEl Sobrante, CA★★★★★5/5
Legacy Post Acute Care11.0 miMartinez, CA★★★★★4/5
Dept of State Hospitals - Napa D/P SNF11.5 miNapa, CA★★★☆☆2/5
San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center11.8 miSan Pablo, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Creekside Healthcare Center11.9 miSan Pablo, CA★★★★★4/5
Vale Healthcare Center12.0 miSan Pablo, CA★★★☆☆2/5
The Meadows of Napa Valley12.3 miNapa, CA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Vallejo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055222.