Springs Road Healthcare
1527 Springs Rd, Vallejo, CA 94591 · Solano County · 65 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1974
Part of chain: BVHC, LLC (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (24)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Mar 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.30 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 38% in California; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 40% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.95 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 36% in California; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 37% in California; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 19.7 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 7% in California; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 8% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.50, weekend 3.65. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airey, Connor | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Airey, Connor | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Anierdes, Princes Valerie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Anierdes, Princes Valerie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Ballesteros, Francia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Ballesteros, Francia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Calabazaron, Redentor | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2022 |
| Calabazaron, Redentor | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2022 |
| Dhugga, Gurpreet | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Dhugga, Gurpreet | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Espinoza, Desire | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/18/2025 |
| Espinoza, Desire | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/18/2025 |
| Secena, Edgar | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Secena, Edgar | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Thapa, Nischal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2024 |
| Thapa, Nischal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heartwood Avenue Healthcare | 1.1 mi | Vallejo, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Solano Post Acute | 1.7 mi | Vallejo, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alhambra Post Acute | 8.7 mi | Martinez, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Greenridge Post Acute | 10.7 mi | El Sobrante, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Legacy Post Acute Care | 11.0 mi | Martinez, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Dept of State Hospitals - Napa D/P SNF | 11.5 mi | Napa, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center | 11.8 mi | San Pablo, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Creekside Healthcare Center | 11.9 mi | San Pablo, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Vale Healthcare Center | 12.0 mi | San Pablo, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Meadows of Napa Valley | 12.3 mi | Napa, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055222.