Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center
1800 Adobe Street, Concord, CA 94520 · Contra Costa County · 99 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1976
Part of chain: GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 4.1★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 8, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Feb 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (23)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 28, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 11).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.74 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 20% in California; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 35% in California; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.09 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 28% in California; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in California; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.1 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 46% in California; top 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 31% in California; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.46, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Generations Healthcare, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2017 |
| Mastrocola, Lois | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2017 |
| Olds, Thomas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2017 |
| Smith, Fred | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2017 |
| Barrerro, Augusto | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/06/2016 |
| Barrerro, Augusto | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/06/2016 |
| Bhambra, Preet | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Bhambra, Preet | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Bmo Bank National Association | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/06/2021 |
| Bmo Bank National Association | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/06/2021 |
| Bmo Bank National Association | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2025 |
| Contra Costa Re, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2017 |
| Dhaddey, Prabjot | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2022 |
| Dhaddey, Prabjot | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2022 |
| Endriga, Chona | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2020 |
| Endriga, Chona | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2020 |
| Fetalino, Leigh Ann | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2019 |
| Fetalino, Leigh Ann | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2019 |
| Harrison, Dennis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2018 |
| Harrison, Dennis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2018 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can I see a sample menu, and how do you handle special diets like low-sodium or diabetic meals?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Who oversees residents' therapeutic diets, and how do the doctor and dietitian work together on them?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What are your rules for bringing in my family member's favorite foods, and how are they stored?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Pass Healthcare Center | 1.1 mi | Concord, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Concord Post Acute | 1.5 mi | Concord, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Diablo Valley Post Acute | 1.7 mi | Concord, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Legacy Post Acute Care | 2.9 mi | Martinez, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pleasant Hill Post Acute | 3.2 mi | Pleasant Hill, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stonebrook Post Acute | 3.3 mi | Concord, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Shadelands Post Acute | 3.4 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rosewood Post Acute | 3.4 mi | Pleasant Hill, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| La Casa via Transitional Care Center | 4.5 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tampico Healthcare Center | 4.6 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alhambra Post Acute | 5.3 mi | Martinez, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cent | 7.0 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056260.