How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Greenridge Post Acute
2150 Pyramid Drive, El Sobrante, CA 94803 (opens Google Maps) · Contra Costa County · (510) 758-9600· 60 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Dec 12, 1974 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 25, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint F-0697
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jul 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 10, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 10, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.41
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.15
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.06
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.41 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 33% in California; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.15 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 7% in California; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.06 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 30% in California; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.92 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 9% in California; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.5 | 36.7 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in California; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.6 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 30% in California; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 1.15, weekend 4.06.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Greenridge Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arpd, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/16/2022 |
| Aspen Skilled Healthcare INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Bradshaw, Peter | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2023 |
| Elsner, Eric | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Kirkwood, Jared | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Orgill, Craig | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Parti, Rajesh | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Parti, Shruty | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Paxman, Marcus | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Sequoia Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Altura, Rojeanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2025 |
| Altura, Rojeanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2025 |
| Arpd, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Arpd, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2022 |
| Aspen Healthcare Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Bradshaw, Jeffrey | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2026 |
| Bradshaw, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Brady, Vern | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Camacho, Jesus | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Camacho, Jesus | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Aspen Skilled Healthcare — 35 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Hillcrest Heights Healthcare Center — San Diego, CA · overall 5/5
- Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare Center — Los Angeles, CA · overall 1/5abuse
- Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare Center — Gardena, CA · overall 3/5
- La Casa via Transitional Care Center — Walnut Creek, CA · overall 5/5
- Lake Park Healthcare Center — Oakland, CA · overall 3/5
- Lodi Nursing & Rehabilitation — Lodi, CA · overall 4/5
- Marina Pointe Healthcare & Subacute — Culver City, CA · overall 3/5
- Mission Palms Healthcare Center — Westminster, CA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 34 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 87 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center | 1.7 mi | San Pablo, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Creekside Healthcare Center | 2.2 mi | San Pablo, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Vale Healthcare Center | 2.2 mi | San Pablo, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Richmond Post Acute Care | 2.9 mi | Richmond, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Shields Richmond Nursing Center | 3.7 mi | Richmond, CA | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Shields Nursing Center | 4.1 mi | El Cerrito, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chaparral House | 6.5 mi | Berkeley, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kyakameena Care Center | 7.1 mi | Berkeley, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Elmwood Care Center | 7.3 mi | Berkeley, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ashby Care Center | 7.5 mi | Berkeley, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Berkeley Pines Skilled Nursing Center | 7.6 mi | Berkeley, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Orinda Care Center, LLC | 8.5 mi | Orinda, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Contra Costa, CA — 30 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- La Casa via Transitional Care Center — Walnut Creek, CA · overall 5/5
- Legacy Post Acute Care — Martinez, CA · overall 5/5
- Lone Tree Post Acute — Antioch, CA · overall 4/5
- Moraga Post Acute — Moraga, CA · overall 5/5
- Pittsburg Skilled Nursing Center — Pittsburg, CA · overall 1/5
- Pleasant Hill Post Acute — Pleasant Hill, CA · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056457.