CaliforniaMartinez

Legacy Post Acute Care

1790 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553 · Contra Costa County · 96 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Nov 12, 1996

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.48
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 14, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Oct 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 16, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Aug 16, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 16, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 16, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940E
202250F
202570D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.484.313.95top 29% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.760.610.69top 19% in California; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.063.903.50top 30% in California; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.680.510.48top 16% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.336.745.8top 20% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.038.142.9top 38% in California; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.30, RN 0.73, weekend 3.90. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Joseph, TomIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2008
Broach, JasmineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2019
Broach, JasmineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2019
Bughio, SaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Bughio, SaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Castillo, MylaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2024
Castillo, MylaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2024
Clement, SharlettaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2023
Clement, SharlettaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2023
Cooper, DustinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Cooper, DustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Cruz, MarissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2024
Cruz, MarissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2024
Dantes, AlvinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2022
Dantes, AlvinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2022
Hernandez-Perdomo, YeseniaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Hernandez-Perdomo, YeseniaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Joseph, AprilIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Joseph, AprilIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Joseph, AprilIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Alhambra Post Acute2.5 miMartinez, CA★★★★★4/5
Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center2.9 miConcord, CA★★★★☆3/5
Willow Pass Healthcare Center3.9 miConcord, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Concord Post Acute4.0 miConcord, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Rosewood Post Acute4.1 miPleasant Hill, CA★★★★☆4/5
Pleasant Hill Post Acute4.3 miPleasant Hill, CA★★★★☆3/5
Diablo Valley Post Acute4.6 miConcord, CA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Shadelands Post Acute5.6 miWalnut Creek, CA★★★★☆3/5
La Casa via Transitional Care Center5.8 miWalnut Creek, CA★★★★★4/5
Tampico Healthcare Center5.9 miWalnut Creek, CA★★★★☆3/5
Stonebrook Post Acute6.1 miConcord, CA★★★★☆4/5
Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cent7.8 miWalnut Creek, CA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Martinez →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555684.