CaliforniaVacaville

Vacaville Convalescent and Rehabilitation Center

585 Nut Tree Ct., Vacaville, CA 95687 · Solano County · 120 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Apr 20, 1989

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$7,976
Fines, last 3 years
6.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Dec 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Dec 6, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
2024120E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $7,976.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 6, 2024Fine$7,976

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.174.313.95top 4% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.040.610.69top 10% in California; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.343.903.50top 5% in California; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.750.510.48top 13% in California; top 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.036.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.68, RN 0.96, weekend 4.92. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Niccoli, JosephIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/16/2003
Niccoli, SusanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/16/2003
Vacaville Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/16/2003
Cayanan, AimileeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2006
Cayanan, AimileeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2006
Jalex LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2008
Niccoli, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Niccoli, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Niccoli, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Niccoli, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Niccoli, SusanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Niccoli, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2008
Vacaville Healthcare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Van Aken, TerrellIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2003
Van Aken, TerrellIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Wipfli LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/04/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Vacaville Ranch Post Acute2.7 miVacaville, CA★★★★☆4/5
Laurel Creek Health Center5.7 miFairfield, CA★★★★★4/5
Greenfield Care Center of Fairfield9.0 miFairfield, CA—/5SFF
Emmanuel Care Center - Travis9.0 miFairfield, CA—/5
Fairfield Post Acute Rehabilitation9.0 miFairfield, CA★★★★☆3/5
University Retirement Community at Davis16.9 miDavis, CA★★★★★4/5
Courtyard Health Care Center17.8 miDavis, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Dept of State Hospitals - Napa D/P SNF18.5 miNapa, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Napa Post Acute18.6 miNapa, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Napa Valley Care Center18.6 miNapa, CA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Vacaville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555349.