Vacaville Convalescent and Rehabilitation Center
585 Nut Tree Ct., Vacaville, CA 95687 · Solano County · 120 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Apr 20, 1989
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint |
| Mar 6, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Apr 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Feb 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Feb 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $7,976.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2024 | Fine | $7,976 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.17 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 4% in California; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.04 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 10% in California; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.34 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 5% in California; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.75 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 13% in California; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.68, RN 0.96, weekend 4.92. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niccoli, Joseph | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2003 |
| Niccoli, Susan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2003 |
| Vacaville Healthcare INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2003 |
| Cayanan, Aimilee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2006 |
| Cayanan, Aimilee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2006 |
| Jalex LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2008 |
| Niccoli, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Niccoli, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Niccoli, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Niccoli, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Niccoli, Susan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Niccoli, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2008 |
| Vacaville Healthcare INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Van Aken, Terrell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Van Aken, Terrell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Wipfli LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vacaville Ranch Post Acute | 2.7 mi | Vacaville, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Laurel Creek Health Center | 5.7 mi | Fairfield, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Greenfield Care Center of Fairfield | 9.0 mi | Fairfield, CA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Emmanuel Care Center - Travis | 9.0 mi | Fairfield, CA | —/5 | ||
| Fairfield Post Acute Rehabilitation | 9.0 mi | Fairfield, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| University Retirement Community at Davis | 16.9 mi | Davis, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Courtyard Health Care Center | 17.8 mi | Davis, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Dept of State Hospitals - Napa D/P SNF | 18.5 mi | Napa, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Napa Post Acute | 18.6 mi | Napa, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Napa Valley Care Center | 18.6 mi | Napa, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555349.