OklahomaSand Springs

Sand Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation

1025 North Adams, Sand Springs, OK 74063 · Tulsa County · 173 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1997

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CONHOLD (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,281
Fines, last 3 years
4.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 13, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 28, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
May 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
2024110E
202621J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,281.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 13, 2026Fine$8,281

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.384.583.95bottom 40% in Oklahoma; top 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.260.410.69bottom 19% in Oklahoma; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.184.163.50top 48% in Oklahoma; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.280.48bottom 13% in Oklahoma; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)67.655.545.8bottom 20% in Oklahoma; bottom 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.26, RN 0.19, weekend 3.11. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Sullivan Sand Springs TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest45%08/29/2013
Sullivan, JamesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/29/2013
Tenant One, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/29/2013
Allred, AmyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2018
Armstrong BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2013
Comprehensive Management Services, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2013
Sullivan, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home5.2 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Saint Simeons Episcopal Home6.4 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆4/5
Covenant Living at Inverness7.4 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Colonial Manor Nursing Home8.6 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center9.1 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Oklahoma Memory Care Institute9.2 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Green Country Care Center9.2 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Zarrow Pointe9.2 miTulsa, OK★★★★★4/5
The Villages at Southern Hills9.4 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Trinity Woods, INC.9.8 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Beacon Ridge10.2 miSapulpa, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center10.8 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sand Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375285.