Beacon Ridge

Name: Beacon Ridge
Address: 102 EAST LINE AVENUE, Sapulpa, OK, 74066, US
Telephone: 9182161811

102 East Line Avenue, Sapulpa, OK 74066 · Creek County · 69 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Apr 26, 2018

Part of chain: SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.52

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Sep 8, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 8, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 16).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	2	E
2023	10	E
2024	20	E
2025	3	D
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 2 Medicare payment denial periods.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jan 9, 2024	Payment Denial	6 days from Feb 23, 2024
Sep 8, 2023	Payment Denial	7 days from Dec 8, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Oklahoma avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.52	4.58	3.95	bottom 49% in Oklahoma; top 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.36	0.41	0.69	bottom 45% in Oklahoma; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.21	4.16	3.50	top 45% in Oklahoma; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.22	0.28	0.48	bottom 39% in Oklahoma; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	60.0	55.5	45.8	bottom 35% in Oklahoma; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	60.0	53.6	42.9	bottom 43% in Oklahoma; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.27, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Oelbaum, Yitzchok	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	15%	01/06/2023
Rivers Edge Operations LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/06/2023
Rivers Edge Partners LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	50%	10/01/2023
Ganz, David	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2023
Ganz, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2022
Kravetz, Avrohom	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2023
Manganya, Richard	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2025
Manganya, Richard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2025
Retter, S. Aryeh	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2023
Rivers Edge Operations LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/15/2025
Rivers Edge Partners LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/15/2025
Spillars, Rodger	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2022
Spillars, Rodger	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
"If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
"If my family member is hospitalized, what is your bed-hold policy and what guarantees their right to return?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Arbor Village	1.0 mi	Sapulpa, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Gardens	2.1 mi	Sapulpa, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Covenant Living at Inverness	6.2 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★★	5/5
Glenwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy	7.9 mi	Glenpool, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home	8.2 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks	8.5 mi	Jenks, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Zarrow Pointe	8.5 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★★	4/5
University Village Retirement Community	9.1 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★☆	3/5
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center	9.6 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Villages at Southern Hills	10.1 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★★	5/5
Sand Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation	10.2 mi	Sand Springs, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Colonial Manor Nursing Home	10.2 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sapulpa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375572.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Beacon Ridge

102 East Line Avenue, Sapulpa, OK 74066 · 9182161811

Health inspection rating 1/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
☐ "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
☐ "If my family member is hospitalized, what is your bed-hold policy and what guarantees their right to return?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 375572 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)