Zarrow Pointe

Name: Zarrow Pointe
Address: 2025 East 71St Street, Tulsa, OK, 74136, US
Telephone: 9184968333

2025 East 71st Street, Tulsa, OK 74136 · Tulsa County · 62 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Nov 15, 2011

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$8,278

Fines, last 3 years

6.32

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 19, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 19, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 25, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Aug 29, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Aug 29, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 19, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 19, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 24, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 24, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 24, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 24, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 24, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 24, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 24, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	7	0	E
2024	7	0	E
2025	5	2	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,278.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 19, 2025	Fine	$8,278

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Oklahoma avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	6.32	4.58	3.95	top 2% in Oklahoma; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.76	0.41	0.69	top 6% in Oklahoma; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.65	4.16	3.50	top 4% in Oklahoma; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.41	0.28	0.48	top 13% in Oklahoma; top 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	41.0	55.5	45.8	top 16% in Oklahoma; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	41.7	53.6	42.9	top 34% in Oklahoma; top 50% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.57, RN 0.66, weekend 4.98. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
The Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement and Health Care Center INC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Adelson, David	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/30/2023
Adelson, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/30/2023
Bumgarner, Leslie	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2020
Bumgarner, Leslie	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2020
Bumgarner, Leslie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2020
Burnstein, Daniel	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/30/2023
Burnstein, Daniel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/30/2023
Burnstein, Irene	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2011
Burnstein, Irene	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2011
Carment, John	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Carment, John	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Carment, John	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Cash, Sharon	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2020
Cash, Sharon	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2020
Clayman, John	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/28/2024
Clayman, John	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/28/2024
Coretz, Robert	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/27/2014
Coretz, Robert	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/27/2014
Coretz, Tyler	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/27/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center	1.2 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Villages at Southern Hills	1.7 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★★	5/5
University Village Retirement Community	2.0 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★☆	3/5
Colonial Manor Nursing Home	2.1 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★☆	3/5
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks	2.4 mi	Jenks, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Covenant Living at Inverness	2.8 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★★	5/5
Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center	3.5 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Montereau, INC.	3.8 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home	4.0 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Tulsa Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare	4.1 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★☆☆☆	4/5
Oklahoma Memory Care Institute	4.8 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Trinity Woods, INC.	4.8 mi	Tulsa, OK	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tulsa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375547.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Zarrow Pointe

2025 East 71st Street, Tulsa, OK 74136 · 9184968333

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $8,278

Most serious findings on record:

▲ May 19, 2025 (F-0656, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
▲ May 19, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 375547 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)