Sequoyah Pointe Living Center
8515 North 123rd East Avenue, Owasso, OK 74055 · Tulsa County · 92 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Jul 20, 1998
Part of chain: CONHOLD (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (18)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Apr 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint |
| Jul 31, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 7, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Nov 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $52,192, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 | Fine | $52,192 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | Payment Denial | 17 days from Feb 24, 2024 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.48 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Oklahoma; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 39% in Oklahoma; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.30 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 38% in Oklahoma; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Oklahoma; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.0 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 29% in Oklahoma; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.26, weekend 3.29. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan, James | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/27/2010 |
| Allred, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Allred, Amy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Conhold of Owasso LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2010 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How quickly are lab tests done and results acted on when a resident's doctor orders them?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Highlands at Owasso | 0.0 mi | Owasso, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Baptist Village of Owasso | 1.6 mi | Owasso, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| North County Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.9 mi | Collinsville, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Green Country Care Center | 7.6 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rolling Hills Care Center | 8.7 mi | Catoosa, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Tulsa Nursing Center | 9.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saint Simeons Episcopal Home | 10.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Leisure Village Health Care Center | 10.6 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Skiatook Nursing Home,llc | 10.7 mi | Skiatook, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Emerald Care Center Tulsa | 10.7 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375344.