How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
225 Cleveland Avenue, Milford, OH 45150 (opens Google Maps) · Clermont County · (513) 248-1270· 93 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Jul 30, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: UNITED CHURCH HOMES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. F-0770
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Oct 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Oct 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Dec 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · F-0646 |
| Dec 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Dec 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Aug 22, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 22, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 22, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · F-0646 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.47 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 7% in Ohio; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 19% in Ohio; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.95 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 8% in Ohio; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 47% in Ohio; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 21% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 13.3 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 7% in Ohio; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.51, RN 0.76, weekend 3.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for S.e.m. Haven Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel, Kenneth | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2011 |
| Howell, Joyce | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2015 |
| Howell, Joyce | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2015 |
| Kuethe, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2015 |
| Kuethe, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2015 |
| Mooney, Charles | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2012 |
| Renner, John | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2014 |
| United Church Homes Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2014 |
| Wolf, Barbara | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/25/1999 |
All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain United Church Homes — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Laurels of Milford | 2.3 mi | Milford, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Arbors at Milford | 2.9 mi | Milford, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Florentine Gardens | 3.5 mi | Loveland, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Madeira Healthcare Center | 3.8 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Forest Hills Healthcare Center. | 3.8 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Indianspring of Oakley | 4.3 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St. Theresa Care Center | 4.4 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Otterbein Loveland | 4.4 mi | Loveland, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Kenwood Terrace Healthcare Center | 4.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Courtyard at Seasons | 4.9 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Madeira | 5.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Montgomery Care Center | 5.4 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Clermont, OH — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365628.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details