How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Montgomery Care Center
7777 Cooper Road, Cincinnati, OH 45242 (opens Google Maps) · Hamilton County · (513) 793-5092· 99 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Jul 25, 1975 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARECORE HEALTH (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 19, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 12, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.35
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 12, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 12, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 16, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 28 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint F-0921
The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. F-0687
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
View all 28 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Mar 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.35
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.44
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.81
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.35 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 47% in Ohio; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 27% in Ohio; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.81 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Ohio; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Ohio; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 66.7 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 11% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 43.9 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.44, weekend 2.78.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Montgomery Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carecore Health LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Carecore Health LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Customers Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/14/2020 |
| Fasten Halberstam LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Chaim | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Chaim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Chaim | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Chaim | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Chaim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hertanu, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Kuranga, Abraham | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Kuranga, Abraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2025 |
| Laghaie, Eitan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Laghaie, Eitan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Montgomery at Carecore LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carecore Health — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Westmoreland Place — Chillicothe, OH · overall 1/5
- Willowood Care Center of Brunswick — Brunswick, OH · overall 3/5
- Carecore at Lima — Lima, OH · overall 3/5
- Carecore at Margaret Hall — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
- Carecore at Mary Scott — Dayton, OH · overall 3/5
- Carecore at Mentor — Mentor, OH · overall 1/5
- Carecore at the Meadows — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
- Garden Park Health Care Center — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "How is routine foot care handled here, and does a podiatrist visit regularly?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 67% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 123 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Lakes | 0.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Blue Ash Health & Rehab | 1.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Courtyard at Seasons | 1.1 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kenwood Terrace Healthcare Center | 1.3 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Care Center | 2.3 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Madeira Healthcare Center | 2.6 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chamberlin Healthcare Center | 2.8 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Parkview Northwest Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Astoria Place of Silverton | 3.4 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Florentine Gardens | 3.4 mi | Loveland, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Madeira | 3.8 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mount Notre Dame Health Center | 4.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hamilton, OH — 69 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Mount Washington Care Center — Cincinnati, OH · overall 3/5
- Mt Airy Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
- Mt Healthy Christian Home — Cincinnati, OH · overall 5/5
- Norwood Towers Post-Acute — Cincinnati, OH · overall 2/5
- Ohio Living Llanfair — Cincinnati, OH · overall 5/5
- Pleasant Ridge Healthcare Center — Cincinnati, OH · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365327.