Rosebud Village
2050 Chester Blvd, Richmond, IN 47374 · Wayne County · 110 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Mar 15, 1984
Part of chain: AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES (90 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 15, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jan 10, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (21)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Feb 15, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| May 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.26 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 49% in Indiana; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 22% in Indiana; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.77 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 42% in Indiana; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 45% in Indiana; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.8 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 11% in Indiana; top 18% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 17.6 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 12% in Indiana; top 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.32, RN 0.78, weekend 2.82. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcorn, Kari | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/06/2021 |
| Alcorn, Kari | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2026 |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2026 |
| Babcock, Paul | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2020 |
| Babcock, Paul | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2020 |
| Byrd, Julia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/15/2021 |
| Caine, Virginia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/10/1994 |
| Chies, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/17/2016 |
| Cse Richmond LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Cse Richmond LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Dice, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Dice, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Doucet, Kelly | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2025 |
| Drummer, Carl | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Fisch, Gary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Goddard, Nichole | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2022 |
| Goddard, Nichole | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2022 |
| Hanify, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Harris, Lisa | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2003 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How is routine foot care handled here, and does a podiatrist visit regularly?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What specific dementia training do your staff receive, and how do you handle difficult moments without medication?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willows of Richmond | 0.0 mi | Richmond, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Springs of Richmond, the | 0.5 mi | Richmond, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brickyard Healthcare - Richmond Care Center | 2.7 mi | Richmond, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Forest Park Health Campus | 3.4 mi | Richmond, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Arbor Trace Health & Living Community | 3.8 mi | Richmond, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care Center | 4.4 mi | Richmond, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Ambassador Healthcare | 5.8 mi | Centerville, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vancrest Health Care Center of Eaton | 14.5 mi | Eaton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Greenbriar Nursing Center | 14.8 mi | Eaton, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Envive of Liberty | 15.7 mi | Liberty, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155230.