IndianaIndianapolis

Spring Mill Meadows

2140 W 86th St, Indianapolis, IN 46260 · Marion County · 124 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Mar 13, 1974

Part of chain: AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES (90 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 5, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 11, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 16, 2023 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 17, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 28, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361G ▲
202480E
2025132G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.583.423.95top 32% in Indiana; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.630.620.69top 38% in Indiana; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.223.013.50top 28% in Indiana; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.470.48top 49% in Indiana; top 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.145.945.8bottom 23% in Indiana; bottom 25% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.140.442.9bottom 36% in Indiana; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.65, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
American Senior Communities LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2003
American Senior Communities LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/23/2025
Babcock, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2020
Babcock, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2020
Caine, VirginiaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/10/1994
Chies, StevenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/17/2016
Dice, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Dice, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Doucet, KellyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2025
Drummer, CarlIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Fisch, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Goddard, NicholeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2022
Goddard, NicholeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2022
Hanify, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Harris, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/22/2003
Horn, BrendaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2023
Jackson, BlakeIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2003
Jackson, EthanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2003
Jackson, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2003
Jackson, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care Center0.1 miIndianapolis, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
St Augustine Home for the Aged0.2 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★★4/5
Marquette0.5 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★★4/5
Harcourt Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation0.6 miIndianapolis, IN★★☆☆☆1/5
Hooverwood2.4 miIndianapolis, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Hoosier Village3.0 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★☆4/5
Robin Run Health Center4.1 miIndianapolis, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Retreat at the Stratford, the4.2 miCarmel, IN★★★★☆4/5
Wellbrooke of Carmel4.4 miCarmel, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Barrington of Carmel, the4.7 miCarmel, IN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Indianapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155154.