616 Wade Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27605 (opens Google Maps) · Wake County · (919) 828-6251· 157 certified beds · avg 135 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (43 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 12, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 26, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 12, 2023 · F-0867
The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 7, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint F-0585
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
| Mar 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 12 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $48,754.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2023 | Fine | $48,754 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.76 | 4.01 | 3.95 | top 44% in North Carolina; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 15% in North Carolina; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.36 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 43% in North Carolina; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 32% in North Carolina; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 59.7 | 49.0 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in North Carolina; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 60.0 | 45.7 | 42.9 | bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.33, weekend 3.25.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.63 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Raleigh Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronquist 2015 Family Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2015 |
| John J Notermann Business Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2017 |
| Sovereign Carolina Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/06/2014 |
| Amitrone, Terri | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2026 |
| Amitrone, Terri | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2026 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Kelly, Michelle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Kelly, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Melton, Donald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Melton, Donald | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Notermann, Brenda | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2025 |
| O Brien, Patrick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/22/2017 |
| O Brien, Patrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/22/2017 |
| Peck, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/29/2026 |
| Peck, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/29/2026 |
| Southern Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Southern Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2025 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sovereign Healthcare Holdings — 43 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 42 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloomsbury at Hayes Barton Place | 1.1 mi | Raleigh, NC | —/5 | ||
| The Cardinal at North Hills | 2.8 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hillcrest Raleigh at Crabtree Valley | 3.0 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rex Rehab & Nursing Care Center | 3.1 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pruitthealth-Raleigh | 3.6 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunnybrook Rehabilitation Center | 3.7 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Tower Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.8 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Capital Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.9 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Laurels of Forest Glenn | 6.3 mi | Garner, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.0 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Rosewood Health Center | 7.0 mi | Raleigh, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Highfield Nursing and Rehabilitation | 7.5 mi | Cary, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Wake, NC — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345049.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details